DQ’d for THIS “Legal” Submission?! Exploring BJJ Rule Controversies

This blog discusses a recent disqualification in a Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu competition due to an outdated rule regarding ankle locks, highlighting the need for rule updates in the Asian Sports Jiu-Jitsu Federation to align with modern practices and safety standards.

In the world of Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu (BJJ), rules and regulations play a crucial role in ensuring the safety of competitors while maintaining the integrity of the sport. However, as the sport evolves, some rules can become outdated and lead to confusion and frustration among practitioners. This blog post delves into a recent disqualification incident at the Kodiak Kup 9 tournament, which raised questions about the relevance of certain rules in the Asian Sports Jiu-Jitsu Federation (ASJJF).

The Incident

During the finals match of the brown belt division at Kodiak Kup 9, a competitor (Horikawa 堀川大地) was disqualified for executing an illegal submission (under the Asian Sport JiuJitsu Federation ASJJF) that was deemed legal under new IBJJF (International Brazilian Jiujitsu Federation) rules. The specific rule in question pertains to the straight ankle lock, where competitors are allowed to move their hips to the outside but not to the inside. This rule has sparked significant debate among practitioners, as it seems to lack a clear rationale.

Understanding the Rule

The ASJJF attempts to follow the International Brazilian Jiu-Jitsu Federation (IBJJF) rules, but many argue that they are outdated. The rule states that if a competitor rotates towards the non-attacking leg while in a straight ankle lock, it is considered to create unnecessary stress on the knee, leading to disqualification. This raises the question: why is this rule still in place when it does not seem to protect anyone?

The Reaction

Upon the disqualification, the competitors were left bewildered. The being attacked (Marshall Stamper) believed the match was stopped to protect his ankle, which was indeed in a precarious position. However, the referee clarified that the disqualification was due to the competitor (Horikawa 堀川大地) turning the wrong way while attempting to finish a straight ankle lock, leading to a collective confusion about the purpose of the rule.

Community Response

The incident prompted discussions on social media, particularly on Instagram, where high-level BJJ practitioners expressed their disbelief regarding the rule. Many questioned its validity, with no one able to provide a satisfactory explanation for its existence. This lack of consensus highlights a significant disconnect between the rules and the practical realities of BJJ.

The Broader Implications

The ASJJF, established in 2011, has become a dominant force in regulating BJJ competitions in Asia. However, its adherence to outdated rules can hinder the development of athletes and the sport itself. The disqualification incident serves as a reminder that rules must evolve alongside the sport to ensure they are relevant and beneficial.

The Case for Change

Many practitioners believe that rules regarding leg locks and reaping should be revisited, especially for higher belt levels. The argument is that as athletes progress, they should be exposed to more advanced techniques, including heel hooks and reaping, to prepare them for competition. The current restrictions can leave competitors at a disadvantage, especially when facing opponents who have had more exposure to these techniques.

Safety vs. Progression

While safety is paramount in any sport, the approach to protecting lower belts from advanced techniques must be balanced with the need for progression. Many agree that banning reaping and heel hooks for white and blue belts is reasonable, but as practitioners advance to purple and brown belts, they should be allowed to practice and compete with these techniques.

The Role of Education

Education plays a crucial role in ensuring that athletes understand the risks associated with various techniques. Practitioners should be taught how to safely execute and defend against leg locks and reaping, which can help mitigate the risk of injury. This education should begin early in their training to build a solid foundation.

Conclusion

The disqualification at Kodiak Kup 9 has sparked a necessary conversation about the relevance of certain BJJ rules, particularly those enforced by the ASJJF. As the sport continues to grow and evolve, it is essential for governing bodies to reassess their regulations to ensure they align with modern practices and the safety of competitors. The BJJ community must advocate for changes that reflect the realities of the sport, allowing athletes to train and compete effectively while minimizing unnecessary risks.

What are your thoughts?

What are your thoughts on the current rules in BJJ? Are there any other regulations you believe need to be revised? Join the conversation and share your experiences with leg locks and reaping in your training and competitions.

---